Skip to content

WIRS

WIRS RESEARCH HUB

From an interesting case to a meaningful publication.

WIRS turns an interesting case or research idea into a structured, supervised and achievable opportunity — with a clear stage, an accountable lead, an appropriate supervisor and defined contribution roles, so members can take part meaningfully without carrying an entire project alone.

How the Research Hub works.

01

Find an opportunity

Browse candidate cases and workstreams below. Every listing shows its real stage, so you always know what exists today and what is still pending review.

02

Join a defined role

Each opportunity breaks down into bounded contribution roles — from literature review to figure preparation — so you can contribute without owning the entire project.

03

Build towards an output

Consented, ethics-cleared work moves through a documented pathway from proposal to submission, with authorship agreed early and based on actual contribution.

Research portfolio snapshot.

Four workstreams make up the current WIRS research portfolio. Status labels reflect where each one genuinely stands today.

In development

Case-report pipeline

A repeatable, supervised process from consultant review to manuscript.

Proposed

Registrar research support

Guidance, statistics liaison and manuscript support for registrar-led projects.

Awaiting committee review

Wits-circuit collaboration

Structured collaboration on research projects across the wider Wits academic radiology circuit.

Feasibility only

National IR database feasibility

Feasibility and governance exploration only — no clinical data collection.

Candidate opportunities.

Generic, non-identifying categories under early review. None of the following has been confirmed as an active project.

Complex tumour embolisation

Candidate case report · Under review

Seeking

Literature reviewer · Figure preparation · Manuscript contributor

Next

Consultant suitability review

Head-and-neck intervention

Candidate case report · Under review

Seeking

Literature reviewer · Protocol and ethics support · Manuscript contributor

Next

Research committee triage

Vascular infection and aneurysm intervention

Candidate case report · Awaiting lead

Seeking

Case and data curator · Statistics liaison · Abstract preparation

Next

Assignment of an accountable lead

Musculoskeletal tumour embolisation

Candidate case report · Awaiting supervisor

Seeking

Literature reviewer · Figure preparation · Manuscript contributor

Next

Confirmation of an appropriate supervisor

No patient information or clinical media is hosted on this platform.

Ways to contribute.

Every role below is bounded and realistic. Authorship is never promised — it depends on agreed and documented contribution.

Coordinate

Track stage, roles and next decisions, and liaise with the supervising consultant.

Review the literature

Run a structured literature search and produce a first-pass reference summary.

Curate the case and figures

Prepare a de-identified case timeline and publication-ready figures from approved imaging.

Support protocol, ethics or statistics

Help draft the protocol, support the ethics submission, or advise on statistical approach.

Write the manuscript

Draft a specific section of the manuscript under the lead author's direction.

Prepare an abstract or poster

Turn a drafted manuscript or case summary into a congress abstract or poster.

From case to publication.

Every candidate opportunity moves through the same governed sequence.

  1. Propose
  2. Review and triage
  3. Confirm team and contribution plan
  4. Confirm consent, ethics and governance
  5. Develop and internally review
  6. Submit and archive

Research support roadmap.

Resources in development to support every project on the pathway.

Resources in development

Templates

Case-report structure and project-planning tools.

Research guidance

Reporting guidelines, contribution and authorship guidance.

Analysis and submission support

Data planning, statistics liaison, journals and congresses.

Governance.

  • No patient-identifiable information is stored on the public WIRS platform.
  • Approval and supervision remain project-specific.
  • Consent, ethics and data-governance requirements must be confirmed before work begins.
  • Authorship is based on documented contribution, not automatically promised.
  • Clinical media must follow approved institutional handling — never personal devices or cloud storage.
  • Internal research operations are being developed separately and are not publicly accessible.

Bring a case. Join a project. Build an output.

Current Wits members can approach the WIRS committee through established departmental channels. Formal society contact details will be published once confirmed.